Difference between revisions of "S16: Laser Cutter Motor Controller"

From Embedded Systems Learning Academy
Jump to: navigation, search
(Software Design)
(Testing & Technical Challenges)
Line 85: Line 85:
  
 
== Testing & Technical Challenges ==
 
== Testing & Technical Challenges ==
Describe the challenges of your project. What advise would you give yourself or someone else if your project can be started from scratch again?
+
Given another few weeks on this project, it could have been completed. A large portion of the learning from this project was in the hardware assembly phase. I learned that to effectively design and implement custom PCBs with SMT a good rework station or oven is required. I will be purchasing these items in the very near future.
Make a smooth transition to testing section and described what it took to test your project.
 
 
 
Include sub-sections that list out a problem and solution, such as:
 
  
 
=== Issue #1 Assembly ===
 
=== Issue #1 Assembly ===

Revision as of 01:02, 25 May 2016

Grading Criteria

  • How well is Software & Hardware Design described?
  • How well can this report be used to reproduce this project?
  • Code Quality
  • Overall Report Quality:
    • Software Block Diagrams
    • Hardware Block Diagrams
      Schematic Quality
    • Quality of technical challenges and solutions adopted.

Project Title

Laser Cutter Motor Controller

Abstract

This is a PoC (Proof of Concept) project to aid in the design of my CmpE 195A senior project. For this PoC I will be using a joystick hooked up to one SJOne board to wirelessly (or not) control another SJOne board which will in turn control 2 stepper motor controller chips to finally control 2 stepper motors on my laser cutter.

Objectives & Introduction

The LazTech Motor Driver should be able to drive two motors independently. It should be able to follow both scripted and manually input movement commands which include: moves, lines, and curves.

Team Members & Responsibilities

  • Alex Kennedy
    • Hardware design
    • Software design
    • System integration

Schedule

Week# Date Task Actual
1 4/11 Initialization Completed
2 4/18 PCB Design Completed. Some of the traces are not ideally placed but they should still work.
3 4/25 Order Parts and Start Coding Completed
4 5/2 Finish Coding and Assemble Not completed. Due to problems with assembling the board, it is going to be impossible to complete this project on time. (See the Issues section for details.)
5 5/9 Finalization Completed.

Parts List & Cost

Figure 1. Bill of Materials

Design & Implementation

Below are the hardware and software design files. This includes both the hardware schematics and board layout (all layers). In addition the software workflow is provided.

The main interface is a simple GPIO clock pulse interface that latches into the Allegro stepper motor driver chips. Various options can be specified such as the direction, step size, and sleep functions. Details of how the interface works can be found in the Allegro documentation.

Hardware Design

Figure 2. Schematics
Figure 3. Board layout

Hardware Interface

In this section, you can describe how your hardware communicates, such as which BUSes used. You can discuss your driver implementation here, such that the Software Design section is isolated to talk about high level workings rather than inner working of your project.

Software Design

For this project the task will enter the workflow at the flex scanner stage. from here we can manually generate move, line, and curve primitives which can be queued into the curve queue. For this project only one static graphics stack will be required and therefore graphics opcodes will not need to be decoded. Additionally a graphics stack will not be required. Once a set of curves is queued and a stroke command is sent, the cut_curve task will be started which will then perform the actual motor control movements.

Figure 4. Software workflow

Implementation

The following are simulated renders of the above board and schematic.

Figure 5. Front of simulated board
Figure 6. Back of simulated board

Testing & Technical Challenges

Given another few weeks on this project, it could have been completed. A large portion of the learning from this project was in the hardware assembly phase. I learned that to effectively design and implement custom PCBs with SMT a good rework station or oven is required. I will be purchasing these items in the very near future.

Issue #1 Assembly

This project was ultimately stopped by a lack of manufacturing hardware. The Allegro stepper motor driver chips use a eTSSOP-24 SMD pad layout. This means that the pin pitch (spacing between pins) is only 0.6 mm. This proved too hard to solder by hand. In order to resolve this issue, a solder paste mask is required. This would allow solder paste to be applied to the pads only and would limit the amount of pin bridging. Due to time constraints it is impossible to order one of these in time for demo.

Conclusion

Conclude your project here. You can recap your testing and problems. You should address the "so what" part here to indicate what you ultimately learnt from this project. How has this project increased your knowledge?

Project Source Code

References

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank my CmpE 195A group for their help in this project.

References Used

List any references used in project.

Appendix

You can list the references you used.