Difference between revisions of "S22: Firebolt"
(→References) |
(→Team Members & Responsibilities) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* Geo Controller | * Geo Controller | ||
* GPS and Compass Interfacing | * GPS and Compass Interfacing | ||
− | |||
* Integration Testing | * Integration Testing | ||
* Wiki Page Update | * Wiki Page Update | ||
Line 53: | Line 52: | ||
* Driver Node | * Driver Node | ||
* LCD interfacing | * LCD interfacing | ||
− | |||
* Integration Testing | * Integration Testing | ||
* Wiki Page Update | * Wiki Page Update |
Revision as of 10:37, 28 May 2022
Contents
- 1 Abstract
- 2 Objectives & Introduction
- 3 Schedule
- 4 Parts List & Cost
- 5 Printed Circuit Board
- 6 CAN Communication
- 7 Sensor and Bluetooth ECU
- 8 Motor ECU
- 9 Geographical And Bridge Controller
- 10 Driver Node
- 11 Mobile Application
- 12 Bluetooth Block
- 13 Map and Marker Blocks
- 14 Testing and Downloading
- 15 Conclusion
Abstract
Firebolt is battery powered autonomous RC car. The car uses four microcontrollers for communication between the nodes- driver node, motor node, bridge & sensor node, and geological node over the CAN bus. It is interfaced to the mobile application which sends GPS coordinates for the destination location to the driver node and reaches the destination by avoiding any obstacles that comes in the path. For obstacle detection and avoidance it uses Ultrasonic Sensor and makes the decision of steering and maintaining speed after performing calculations based on the bridge and sensor node's data.
Objectives & Introduction
Objectives
The objective of this project is to get hands on experience of application of embedded systems in autonomous vehicles, have understanding of CAN bus communication, CAN database files, TDD and other related tools such as PCAN dongle and Busmaster.
Software side
- The car communicates with an Android application
- Receive coordinates from gps to drive itself to the destination while avoiding obstacles
- Display useful information on the LCD
- Take care of elevation and make correct speed decisions
- DBC file for all the nodes
Hardware side
- Design PCB for four controllers and other necessary components
- Choose good options for mounting the ultrasonic sensors on the car
- Make a good GUI Android application for interfacing with the microcontroller
Introduction
The controllers for the project are divided in 5 parts. Each controller has different tasks and communicate with each other over CAN bus.
- Driver Node
- GEO Node
- Sensors and Bridge Node
- Motor Node
- Mobile Application
Team Members & Responsibilities
Priyanka Rai LinkedIn'
- Geo Controller
- GPS and Compass Interfacing
- Integration Testing
- Wiki Page Update
Ritu Patil LinkedIn'
- Motor Controller
- RPM Sensor
- Integration Testing
- Wiki Page Update
Ritika Beniwal LinkedIn'
- Driver Node
- LCD interfacing
- Integration Testing
- Wiki Page Update
Utsav Savaliya LinkedIn'
- Sensor Controller
- Integration Testing
- Wiki Page Update
- Bluetooth integration with Sensor
Dhanush Babu LinkedIn'
- Bluetooth module interfacing
- Motor Controller
- Android App
- Integration Testing
Schedule
Week# | Start Date | Target Date | Task | Completion Date | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Parts List & Cost
Item# | Part Desciption | Vendor | Qty | Price($) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | RC Car | Traxxas [1] | 1 | 280 |
2 | CAN Transceivers MCP2551-I/P | Comimark [2] | 5 | 8.99 |
3 | Ultrasonic Sensors | Max Botix[3] | 4 | 24.95 |
4 | GPS Breakout Board | Adafruit[4] | 1 | 29.95 |
5 | GPS Antenna | Adafruit[5] | 1 | 19.95 |
6 | RPSMA female to mhf4 | Superbat[6] | 1 | 7.99 |
7 | HC05 bluetooth RF Transceiver | HiLetgo[7] | 1 | 15.99 |
8 | Triple-axis Accelerometer | Adafruit[8] | 1 | 14.95 |
9 | Traxxas RPM Sensor | Traxxas[9] | 1 | 13.76 |
10 | Traxxas Battery and Charger | Traxxas[10] | 1 | 62.95 |
11 | Voltage Regulator | Valefod[11] | 6 | 10.99 |
12 | Headlights | Hobbypark[12] | 1 | 7.96 |
Printed Circuit Board
Initially we started our testing with mounting all our hardware on the breadboard (yes, it was messy and unstable!).
PCB Schematic
PCB Board
Challenges
- Since there are four controllers and a significant number of components (gps, sensors, can transceivers, volt regulator etc.) it was difficult for us to keep our hardware stable because every time we go for field testing some will get disconnected and we were kind of stuck up in the hardware setup.
- We decided to get the PCB printed but there were some issues and resolving them and getting a new PCB would take time.
Solution
- Finally we decided to use the prototype board for mounting all the components and stabilizing our hardware.
CAN Communication
We used controller area network to communicate data between four nodes. All nodes are connected to each other through a physically conventional two wire bus CANH and CANL. The wires are a twisted pair with 120 Ω termination resistors at each end of the bus. 1s and 0s are transmitted as CAN High(0V difference) and Can Low(2v difference). A CAN frame has the following contents:
- Data Length Code (4bits)
- Remote Transmission Request.
- ID extend bit.
- Message ID (11 bit or 29 bit)
- Data bytes( depends on DLC)
- CRC
Arbitration: No two nodes will transmit at the same time because of arbitration. A lower Message-ID has a Higher priority on the CAN bus since 0 is the dominant bit.
Bit Stuffing: CAN bus stuffs extra bits when a long chain of multiple 1's or 0's occur to improve CAN integrity.
DBC File
The DBC file is a simple text file that consists of information for decoding raw CAN bus data to physical values or in human readable form.
Sr. No | Message ID | Message function | Receivers |
---|---|---|---|
Driver Heartbeat | |||
1 | 100 | Driver Heartbeat | Motor, Sensor, Geo |
Start Stop signal from Android app to Driver | |||
1 | 101 | Bridge Sensor | Driver |
Ultrasonic sensors data transmit | |||
2 | 101 | Sensor sonars from front, back, left ,right sensor | Driver |
Destination Location | |||
4 | 250 | Bridge Sensor | Geo |
Driver to Motor Command | |||
5 | 300 | Speed and steering direction for the motor | Motor |
Geo Controller | |||
6 | 400 | Bearing, Heading and Distance | Driver |
Motor Controller | |||
7 | 600 | Motor speed | Driver |
Debug messages | |||
8 | 700 | Driver Debug | BRIDGE_SENSOR,MOTOR,GEO |
9 | 750 | Geo Debug | BRIDGE_SENSOR,MOTOR,DRIVER |
VERSION "" NS_ : BA_ BA_DEF_ BA_DEF_DEF_ BA_DEF_DEF_REL_ BA_DEF_REL_ BA_DEF_SGTYPE_ BA_REL_ BA_SGTYPE_ BO_TX_BU_ BU_BO_REL_ BU_EV_REL_ BU_SG_REL_ CAT_ CAT_DEF_ CM_ ENVVAR_DATA_ EV_DATA_ FILTER NS_DESC_ SGTYPE_ SGTYPE_VAL_ SG_MUL_VAL_ SIGTYPE_VALTYPE_ SIG_GROUP_ SIG_TYPE_REF_ SIG_VALTYPE_ VAL_ VAL_TABLE_ BS_: BU_: DRIVER MOTOR BRIDGE_SENSOR GEO DEBUG BO_ 100 DRIVER_HEARTBEAT: 1 DRIVER SG_ DRIVER_HEARTBEAT_cmd : 0|8@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "" BRIDGE_SENSOR,MOTOR,GEO BO_ 101 DRIVE_STATUS: 1 BRIDGE_SENSOR SG_ DRIVE_START_STOP : 0|8@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "" DRIVER BO_ 200 SENSOR_SONARS: 5 BRIDGE_SENSOR SG_ SENSOR_SONARS_left : 0|10@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "cm" DRIVER SG_ SENSOR_SONARS_right : 10|10@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "cm" DRIVER SG_ SENSOR_SONARS_middle : 20|10@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "cm" DRIVER SG_ SENSOR_SONARS_rear : 30|10@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "cm" DRIVER BO_ 250 DESTINATION_LOCATION: 8 BRIDGE_SENSOR SG_ DEST_LATITUDE : 0|28@1+ (0.000001,-90.000000) [-90|90] "degrees" GEO SG_ DEST_LONGITUDE : 28|28@1+ (0.000001,-180.000000) [-180|180] "degrees" GEO BO_ 300 DRIVER_TO_MOTOR: 2 DRIVER SG_ DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed : 0|8@1+ (1,0) [-30|30] "kmph" MOTOR SG_ DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction : 8|8@1- (1,-2) [-2|2] "degrees" MOTOR BO_ 400 GEO_CONTROLLER_COMPASS: 8 GEO SG_ HEADING : 0|12@1+ (0.1,0) [0|359.9] "degrees" DRIVER, BRIDGE_SENSOR SG_ BEARING : 12|12@1+ (0.1,0) [0|359.9] "degrees" DRIVER,BRIDGE_SENSOR SG_ DISTANCE_TO_DESTINATION: 24|32@1+ (0.01,0) [0|359.9] "meters" DRIVER,BRIDGE_SENSOR BO_ 600 MOTOR_SPEED: 2 MOTOR SG_ MOTOR_SPEED_info : 0|8@1+ (0.1,-10) [-10|10] "kmph" DRIVER, BRIDGE_SENSOR BO_ 700 DRIVER_DEBUG: 2 DEBUG SG_ car_driving_status: 0|8@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "" DEBUG SG_ car_steering_status: 8|8@1+ (1,0) [0|0] "" DEBUG BO_ 750 GEO_CONTROLLER_DEBUG_MESG: 10 DEBUG SG_ CURR_LATITUDE : 0|28@1+ (0.000001,-90.000000) [-90|90] "degrees" DEBUG SG_ CURR_LONGITUDE : 28|28@1+ (0.000001,-180.000000) [-180|180] "degrees" DEBUG SG_ RAW_HEADING : 56|12@1+ (0.1,0) [0|359.9] "degrees" DEBUG CM_ BU_ DRIVER "The driver controller driving the car"; CM_ BU_ MOTOR "The motor controller of the car"; CM_ BU_ SENSOR "The sensor controller of the car"; CM_ BO_ 100 "Sync message used to synchronize the controllers"; CM_ BU_ GEO "To provide raw GPS and compass heading"; CM_ SG_ 100 DRIVER_HEARTBEAT_cmd "Heartbeat command from the driver"; VAL_ 300 DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction -2 "MOTOR_direction_HARD_LEFT" -1 "MOTOR_direction_SOFT_LEFT" 0 "MOTOR_direction_STRAIGHT" 1 "MOTOR_direction_SOFT_RIGHT" 2 "MOTOR_direction_HARD_RIGHT" ; VAL_ 700 car_steering_status 2 "RIGHT" 1 "LEFT" 0 "STRAIGHT"; VAL_ 700 car_driving_status 2 "BACKWARD" 1 "FORWARD" 0 "STOPPED";
Technical Challenges
- The CAN transceivers that we bought had inbuilt 120 ohm resistor each, which we didn't notice. And every time we interfaced all the four nodes the data won't show up in the busmaster software. We found this very late and until then we thought it's hardware/dbc file issue and wasted potential amount of time in debugging.So we de-soldered those termination resistors and we were able to see our data smoothly on busmaster.
- As an advice, make sure at the end of all four nodes after adding termination resistors of 120 ohm on both sides, the resultant resistance is 60 ohms. Only then all four nodes can communicate over CAN bus.
Sensor and Bluetooth ECU
Hardware Design
The obstacle detection sensors used here are Ultrasonic sensors. The HRLV-MaxSonar-EZ1 sensors from MaxBotix are used here. In these sensors there is membrane which needs to be triggered in order to generate and send ultrasonic waves every few seconds. When ultrasonic waves collide and come back and strikes with this membrane a pulse is generated which is used for sensing.
Sl No. | SJ2 board Pin No. | Ultrasonic sensor Pin No. | Function |
---|---|---|---|
1. | ADC Pin 1.30 | AN(Front left sensor) | Input to ADC channel 4 |
2. | ADC Pin 1.31 | AN(Front right sensor) | Input to ADC channel 5 |
3. | ADC Pin 1.26 | AN(Front sensor) | Input to ADC channel 3 |
4. | ADC Pin 1.25 | AN(Rear sensor) | Input to ADC channel 3 |
5. | GPIO Pin 0.6 | Rx(Front left sensor) | Triggering pulse for left sensor |
6. | GPIO Pin 0.8 | Rx(Front right sensor) | Triggering pulse for right sensor |
7. | GPIO Pin 0.9 | Rx(Front sensor) | Triggering pulse for front sensor |
8. | GPIO Pin 0.7 | Rx(Rear sensor) | Triggering pulse for rear sensor |
Apart from the pin connections for the Sensor node the important thing is to mount the sensors at particular angles. The angle placement is critical for left and right sensor as we faced lot of problems while detecting the walls. We chose the angle by error and trial method by simply placing the sensors at different angles. We tried keeping the angle above the 45 degrees so that to provide wider angle for the obstacles to detect.
Software Design
The sensor node has to receive values from all the sensors and send the distance values on the CAN bus for the driver to run the obstacle avoidance logic.
Receive sensor values
Four sensors are used here. Three in the front and one at the rear side. We need four ADC channels to address the receiving from all sensors. In order to use four pins on the SJ2 board we need to set the pins to analog mode. In the adc.h file and adc.c file there are only three channels initialized, so one needs to add ADC channel 3 in these files. On how to use these sensors, the datasheet of helped a lot. It addresses every aspect of how to use this particular sensor and the solution to most of the problem that can arise. All the sensor raw values are digitally converted in the range of 0 to 1024( 10 bit ADC). These value is in inches as mentioned in the datasheet. So, one needs to convert it into centimeter by applying some formula. The formula can be different based on the configuration used to setup the ADC channel even if same sensor is used.
Sending sensor values in terms of distance to CAN
The raw values coming from the sensor needs to be filtered before sending on the CAN bus. The more information about filtering is mentioned in the techical challenges section. The below diagram shows the detailed flowchart of software design implemented for the sensor node.
Technical Challenges
- The main challenge while using ultrasonic sensor with this particular project is of crosstalk. While detecting objects in the front all the front sensors waves are interfering with each other giving false values in the left or right sensor while the object is in the front only. The datasheet addresses this issues and what to do when multiple sensors are used in a system. It says that trigger each sensor are different time period in order to avoid crosstalk. So we triggered the front and rear at one particular time and left and right at one particular time. One sequence is triggered at particular 10Hz and other sequence is triggered at another 10Hz. There is a division of callbacks counts in 100Hz and a lock mechanism is used in order to used different 20Hz period out of 100Hz.
- For frequency noise measurements like when the values suddenly change or vary between certain range sometimes, a filter is implemented. The most common filter for this type of use is median filter where a series of values are stored in a array and median is taken of all the values stored in that array.
Motor ECU
The Motor ECU acts as an encoder for the DC motor (used for propulsion) and Servo motor (used for turning the axle and changing direction of the car). The car is a two wheel drive with DC motor connected to the rear wheels and the servo motor is connected to the front wheels. The DC motor is controlled by Electronic Speed Control. The ECU supplies PWM signal to the ESC and the ESC powers the DC motor. The Servo motor is powered by the car battery as well and gets its PWM signal from the ECU. The RPM sensor sends its output to motor ECU by which the actual speed of the wheels is calculated.
Hardware Design
ESC & DC MotorThe DC motor is controlled by ESC using PWM signals provided by the motor controller for forward and reverse movements. We used the 9v NiMH battery to power up the ESC. The DC motor is powered by the ESC which has a dc-to-dc converter which converts 9v to 6v. The output from the ESC is used to power the Servo motor. ESC has an ease set button which is used for calibration and setting different modes for the car. The car can be operated in the following 3 modes:
As we desire to run the car at full throttle, Sport mode is being used. The frequency of the PWM signal fed to the servo motor is 100Hz. Based on the duty cycle set by the user, the car will go forward, reverse, or neutral.
Servo MotorWe are using Traxxas 2075 for this project which came with the car and it is responsible for steering the car. It takes the 6V power directly from ESC. The servo motor is controlled directly from the SJ2 micro-controller board. The PWM signal is supplied at a frequency of 100 Hz. Based on the duty cycle of the signal sent to the servo, the direction of servo motor can be changed: PWM 10 to 14.9 for turning left.
Software DesignAt startup the motor is initialized by giving a neutral PWM signal for 3s and the interrupt for the rpm sensor input is setup as well. The motor receives angle for steering and speed in a single CAN message from the driver ECU. After receiving the command the speed value is converted into corresponding value of PWM by increasing or decreasing neutral PWM value in steps of 0.01. The physical value of the motor speed is compared to the speed received from the driver and it is reduced or increased to match with the desired speed. For reverse a PWM of 14.5 is given to smoothly reverse the car. The direction of the car is set according to the value of ENUM received from the driver ECU. For navigation the car takes soft turns and when and obstacle is detected it takes hard turns to avoid collisions. The period_callbacks__initialize() function calls the following functions:
The period_callbacks__1Hz() function calls the following function:
The period_callbacks__10Hz() function calls the following functions:
Technical Challenges
Geographical And Bridge ControllerHardware DesignThe Geographical controller does the processing for compass data and GPS data. After processing the data for heading ,bearing and distance to destination , the controller sends these data over can bus to the Driver node. The GPS module is interfaced with SJ2 board using UART. SJ2 board gets the data (NMEA string) for GPS coordinates processing. The controller sends the command to GPS module to filter the string and only send GPGGA string. The Compass module is interfaced over I2C to find the heading for car navigation. The CAN transceiver uses port 0 (can1) of the SJ2 board.
Software DesignThe GEO controller consisted of 4 main parts which are:
OverviewThese code modules, calculate compass heading degree, bearing, parse GPS coordinates, calculate the checkpoints the RC car has to go through when navigating to a destination, send distance to destination to driver node, and handle messages received on the CAN bus. The period_callbacks__initialize() function calls the following functions:
The period_callbacks__1Hz() function calls the following function:
The period_callbacks__10Hz() function calls the following functions:
GPS
In the gps__run_once_10Hz() the GPS is initially configured once to disable all NMEA messages except GPGGA which is message chosen to parse the coordinates and GPS lock.
The GPS module constantly transmits NMEA GPGGA messages over UART to the SJ2 MCU. These messages which come in the form of a string are stored character by character in the line buffer until a new line character which indicates the end of string. The stored string is then extracted from the line buffer. The extracted line is then tokenized to parse the latitude, latitude direction, longitude, longitude direction, and fix quality. South and West directions are also properly handled to make the latitude and longitude negative values.
Although the GPS module has fix indication , but GPGGA string has field for FIX status also. Getting the Fix/Lock status using the string is much easier than using GPIO pins to get the Lock status using FIX led of the GPS module. The Lock status/flag was used as a condition to calculate the bearing and checkpoints only when the GPS had a lock meaning that the current coordinates were valid. Compass
The compass initialization configures the LSM303DLHC magnetometer and accelerometer registers over I2C bus to default settings using default gain and single mode.
The compass heading degree is computed by using the tilt compensation algorithm and the pitch and roll values of LSM303DLHC accelerometer. The tilt compensation algorithm ensures that the values of the compass heading are precise. The formulae used to calibrate the compass are mentioned below:
pitch = asin(-acc_x / sqrt(acc_y * acc_y + acc_z * acc_z + acc_x * acc_x))
mag_x = mag_x * cos(pitch) + mag_z * sin(pitch) mag_y = mag_y * cos(roll) + mag_x * sin(roll) * sin(pitch) - mag_z * sin(roll) * cos(pitch) mag_z = -mag_x * cos(roll) * sin(pitch) + mag_y * sin(roll) + mag_z * cos(roll) * cos(pitch)
heading = atan2(mag_y, mag_x) * r2d r2d is radian to degree conversion function This heading is calculated in radians since atan2 returns a value between -π and +π. Therefore, before converting the heading into degrees the value needs to be normalized to put it in the range from 0 to 360 degrees. CheckpointsIn real world, the source and destination are not on a straight line. The car has to find the best possible and smallest route to its final destination. In this project keeping that in mind we have used checkpoint algorithm. These waypoints are known coordinates which are given according to the destination and source path. The car needs to follow the route determined by the waypoints from source to destination. We choose 10 points over a known location and hardcoded these coordinates in GEO node logic. Once our car gets the destination coordinates from Bridge and Sensor controller, it starts giving Heading , Bearing and Distance values to Driver Node. This waypoint must satisfy the below conditions:
So when the algorithm finds the destination coordinates, then bearing is calculated with that particular coordinate, so that car can be further instructions to move towards that particular point. As shown in the figure below, our algorithm keeps finding new coordinates with time (orange ones) and at last go to the final destination coordinates. The algorithm is mentioned below in the form of flowchart and code: The way point calculation determines the nearest way point continuously by computing the distance using Haversine formula and current location using GPS. The heading and bearing is also computed using the Haversine formula and is sent over the CAN bus for heading correction.* Alternatively, once the car is within the threshold distance, next way point is selected and the car heads to the next way point. To calculate the geographical distance between the two points the haversine formula was used which is called periodically from the waypoints.c module. Below is the formula used: a = sin²(ΔlatDifference/2) + cos(lat1) * cos(lt2) * sin²(ΔlonDifference/2) c = 2 * atan2(sqrt(a), sqrt(1−a)) d = R * c
The bearing which is the angle towards our desired destination is computed using the formulas below referenced at this link. X = cos θb * sin ∆L Y = cos θa * sin θb – sin θa * cos θb * cos ∆L β = atan2(X,Y)
The bearing is also calculated in radians since atan2 returns a value between -π and +π. Therefore, before converting the heading into degrees the value needs to be normalized to put it in the range from 0 to 360 degrees. The calculated bearing is then sent to the driver node which use the compass heading degree and the bearing to align the car toward the target destination. Technical Challenges
Driver NodeDriver Node is the master controller. It receives input from sensor and bridge node, processes it to make right decision for controlling the speed and steering direction of the car and then commands the motor node to drive accordingly. This node is also interfaced to the LCD, which acts as dashboard of the car and displays information such as car speed and distance to destination on the screen. HardwareLCD is interfaced with the SJ2 board and it communicates over UART. P4.28 and P4.29 which is UART3 on board is used. Headlights and Tailights are also connected to the driver node using four GPIOs. Software Architecture Driver Logic
Obstacle Avoidance Logicif (obstacle_on_all_front_sides()) { stop_the_car(); reverse_car_and_steer(); } else if (obstacle_on_left() && obstacle_in_right() && (!obstacle_on_front())) { drive_forward(); } else if (obstacle_on_left() && (!obstacle_in_right())) { obstacle_on_right = false; get_steering_range(obstacle_on_right); // right steer } else if (obstacle_in_right() && (!obstacle_on_left())) { obstacle_on_right = true; get_steering_range(obstacle_on_right); // left steer } else if (obstacle_on_front() && (!obstacle_on_left() && !obstacle_in_right())) { stop_the_car(); reverse_car_and_steer(); obstacle_on_right = (internal_sensor_data.SENSOR_SONARS_right < internal_sensor_data.SENSOR_SONARS_left) ? true : false; get_steering_range(obstacle_on_right); } else if (obstacle_on_rear() && (!obstacle_on_all_front_sides())) { obstacle_on_right = (internal_sensor_data.SENSOR_SONARS_right < internal_sensor_data.SENSOR_SONARS_left) ? true : false; get_steering_range(obstacle_on_right); debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = STRAIGHT; } else { stop_the_car(); debug_values.car_driving_status = STOPPED; debug_values.car_steering_status = STRAIGHT; }
if (obstactle_on_right == true) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_HARD_LEFT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; if (obstacle_in_right_far()) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_SOFT_LEFT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; } else if (obstacle_in_right_near()) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_HARD_LEFT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = reduced_speed; } } else { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_HARD_RIGHT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; if (obstacle_on_left_far()) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_SOFT_RIGHT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; } else if (obstacle_on_left_near()) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = MOTOR_direction_HARD_RIGHT; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = reduced_speed; } } motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; // motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = ideal_speed; } Reverse and Steer if (!obstacle_on_rear()) { motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_direction = 0; motor_signal.DRIVER_TO_MOTOR_speed = reverse_speed; update_lights(10, taillight_left); update_lights(10, taillight_right); } else { stop_the_car(); } Driver receives raw heading and bearing from the Geo node and in order to calculate the turning direction, it first computes the difference between heading and bearing. Then based on which quadrant the difference lies and where the destination lies, take navigation decisions to steer left, right or straight. if (heading_difference >= 350 && heading_difference <= 10) { gps_navigation_direction = straight; heading_difference = fabs(heading_difference); debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = STRAIGHT; } else if (heading_difference > 180) { gps_navigation_direction = left; heading_difference = 360 - heading_difference; debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = LEFT; } else if (heading_difference < 0 && heading_difference > -180) { gps_navigation_direction = left; heading_difference = fabs(heading_difference); debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = LEFT; } else if (heading_difference < -180) { gps_navigation_direction = right; heading_difference = fabs(heading_difference + 360); debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = RIGHT; } else if (heading_difference > 0 && heading_difference <= 180) { gps_navigation_direction = right; debug_values.car_driving_status = FORWARD; debug_values.car_steering_status = RIGHT; }
Periodic CallbacksThe period_callbacks__initialize() function calls the following functions: can__bus_initializer(can1); lcd__init(); head_tail_lights_init(); debug_led_init(); The period_callbacks__1Hz() function calls the following function: can_bus_handler_tx_debug_messsages(can1); static uint8_t count = 0; if (count == 0) { lcd__communication_init(); } count = 1; print_info_on_lcd(); The period_callbacks__10Hz() function calls the following functions: can_bus_handler__process_all_received_messages(can1); can_bus_handler__manage_mia(); can_bus_handler_tx_messages(can1); Technical Challenges
Mobile ApplicationThe MIT App inventor 2 is an open-source web application available for free use to develop basic android mobile applications. It circumvents the need to program and develop applications using Java or Kotlin by providing block-based coding and UI development features. It uses a Graphical user Interface (GUI) like the Scratch programming language. Anyone using the web-app would just need to drag and drop blocks to design the UI and use functional blocks to develop logic, functions and flow control. MIT App inventor for android was originally developed by Google and released in 2010. The development team was led by Hal Abelson and Mark Friedman. “In the second half of 2011, Google released the source code, terminated its server, and provided funding to create The MIT Center for Mobile Learning, led by App Inventor creator Hal Abelson and fellow MIT professors Eric Klopfer and Mitchel Resnick. The MIT version was launched in March 2012.” App Inventor has a mobile application called the MIT AI Companion app which can be used to download a server cached version of your app under development. This makes it extremely easy and convenient to test intermediate functions and bug testing as changes can be observed in real-time. Once done with the development, users can download a “.apk” file after building. This is an installable file for the android OS which allows the user to test their app as a standalone android app. The Web app provides two important sections for mobile app development: User Interface
Bluetooth BlockThe firebolt app uses the bluetooth client block to establish a connection with the HC-05 bluetooth module onboard the car. It is necessary to establish connection and connect to a bluetooth pair to send and receive messages.
Map and Marker BlocksThe map block is used to create and display a 2D map of the world for location, navigation and other map functions. It uses an open-source map library which is very similar to Google Maps. The Map bloc has several functions including display, zoom, direction, distance, coordinate calculation. Fireblot uses this block to locate a destination location for the car and send the corresponding latitude and longitude values. This is made possible by the marker block. Markers can be placed on any location on the map and the pinpointed location coordinates can be received as floating point integers. These values are displayed on the app and also used to send as a bluetooth message to the HC-05 module when required. Testing and DownloadingMIT App inventor projects can be accessed for testing on the MIT AI companion app or built into a downloadable APK file. It can also be exported as a file to be later imported. The file extension for an app inventor project is “.aia”.
BluetoothThe HC-05 module is an easy to use bluetooth module that can be used to interface with devices using its Serial Port Protocol. Bluetooth is used for wireless network transmission of data. Technical Challenges
ConclusionThis is not a project where only writing best code for our controller is not good enough. This project tests overall personality. As a team we were not prepared to spend more time on this and due to some mismanagement we were always falling behind. But we tried our best to complete the project with few team members. We learnt different aspect of a product development:
We did our hardware setup much later, we wasted a lot of time in doing connections again and again. A better strategy would have been to get familiar with hardware connections and make a prototype setup to complete the milestones. We were waiting for PCB, which till the end was not completed and had some issues. It was a complete hassle to finalize our hardware in the end and test individual modules again. We got very less time for integration testing, our Geo navigation could have done much better if we would have done proper integration testing.
Project VideoProject Source Codehttps://gitlab.com/ritupatil1/firebolt/-/tree/master https://gitlab.com/Ritika_Beniwal_/firebolt/-/tree/master Advise for Future Students
AcknowledgementWe want to express our gratitude to Professor Preetpal Kang for sharing valuable inputs and knowledge throughout the duration of the project. We would also like to thank the project groups of previous years, which helped us to avoid the mistakes made by them which that we saved some time to understand the concepts better. Referenceshttp://socialledge.com/sjsu/index.php/Industrial_Application_using_CAN_Bus Bridge Sensor ECU Motor ECU
Geographical ECU
|